validate_party_frozen_disabled only enforces Customer/Supplier/Employee,
so passing opportunity_from straight through silently no-op'd for Lead
and Prospect. Made the Customer-only scope explicit instead of relying
on that implicit fallthrough.
Lead.disabled is not enforced anywhere else in the codebase (lead_query,
the picker used for this same field, only filters status/docstatus), so
deliberately not extending validation to Lead-sourced Opportunities.
(cherry picked from commit 8c0a945417)
Request for Quotation overrides validate() entirely and never calls
super().validate(), so it never goes through AccountsController's
party validation. Suppliers also sit in a child table, so the shared
PartyValidator wouldn't have caught it anyway (it only checks a single
top-level party field). A disabled or frozen Supplier could be added
to an RFQ and the RFQ submitted without any warning.
Also filters the suppliers grid's supplier Link field to disabled=0,
matching the same client-side fix applied to Opportunity's party_name.
(cherry picked from commit 4bf65ffc1d)
# Conflicts:
# erpnext/buying/doctype/request_for_quotation/request_for_quotation.py
# erpnext/buying/doctype/request_for_quotation/test_request_for_quotation.py
Opportunity inherits TransactionBase instead of AccountsController, so
it never ran validate_party_frozen_disabled like Quotation, Sales Order
and Sales Invoice do. A disabled Customer could be saved as an
Opportunity's party and only get caught later at Quotation stage.
Also fixes the party_name Link query on the client: it referenced
erpnext.queries.customer, which was never defined, so disabled
customers showed up in the picker.
(cherry picked from commit 90937ce6d9)
The Create Job Card dialog on Work Order lists only pending operations,
so the row idx sent to make_job_card is the dialog's position, not the
Work Order Operation idx. create_job_card stamped that dialog idx into
operation_row_id, and get_required_items then matched raw materials of
whichever operation held that idx originally.
Resolve idx server-side from the Work Order Operation row that
get_operation_details already looks up by name.
Fixes https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/issues/57985
Corrective job cards regenerate required items but are exempt from the
transfer gate on the server; mirror that exemption in materials_ready.
(cherry picked from commit e9533495fc)
When the work order transfers material against Job Card, the Start Job
and Complete Job actions (and the whitelisted start_timer and
complete_job_card methods behind them) accepted work before any
Material Transfer for Manufacture existed; the transfer gate only fired
on job card submission.
Run validate_transfer_qty on both actions, and drop the finished_good
escape in materials_ready so the dashboard hides the buttons while
transfer is pending. Job cards that skip material transfer, corrective
job cards, and work orders transferring against Work Order are exempt,
as on submit.
(cherry picked from commit 808b2e2984)
`time_diff_in_hours` returns hours, so `time_in_mins` needs `* 60`, not
`/ 60`. Matches `Job Card.validate_time_log_row`.
No behaviour change: the `doc.save()` on the next line runs Job Card's
`validate`, which recomputes `time_in_mins` correctly before the row is
written. This only stops the expression from reading as a bug.
(cherry picked from commit 422a9161dd)
* fix: keep source rate on re-fetch when maintain same rate is enabled (#57479)
* fix: type-annotate get_item_details arguments
---------
Co-authored-by: test <test@test.com>
* test: cover both repost branches and the no-repost case
* fix: queue repost for entries backdated by a concurrent submit
---------
(cherry picked from commit 399ff463cc)
Co-authored-by: nareshkannasln <nareshkannashanmugam@gmail.com>
