fix(banking): use custom renderer for translated strings and parser for rules (#56643)
fix(banking): use custom renderer for translated strings and parser for formula evaluation
(cherry picked from commit 8447f551e7)
Co-authored-by: Nikhil Kothari <nik.kothari22@live.com>
The "Is Fully Depreciated" field was hidden on the Asset form (hidden: 1),
so it could never be set for manually entered existing assets.
Make it visible based on context:
- Existing Asset with Calculate Depreciation off -> visible and editable
- Calculate Depreciation on -> visible but read-only and forced unchecked
(it is only meaningful for manually entered assets)
The unchecked value is enforced in the form script (immediate feedback on
toggle and on load) and in server-side validate() so it can never be saved
as checked while depreciation is being calculated.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit a7c1ebacbe)
fix(stock): value batch/serial return from ledger when original receipt has no bundle (#56631)
* fix(stock): value batch/serial return from ledger when original receipt has no bundle
* test(stock): add test to validate the valuation of serial/batch for return when original receipt has no bundle
(cherry picked from commit 6184c057db)
# Conflicts:
# erpnext/stock/doctype/serial_and_batch_bundle/test_serial_and_batch_bundle.py
Co-authored-by: Sudharsanan Ashok <135326972+Sudharsanan11@users.noreply.github.com>
fix: carry item-level project to Purchase Receipt GL entries (#56568)
Purchase Receipt stock and asset GL lines used the item row's cost center
but always fell back to the document-level project, unlike Purchase Invoice
which uses the item-level project. add_gl_entry accepted a project argument
but never wrote it to the GL dict, so the inward, Stock Received But Not
Billed, landed cost, divisional loss, sub-contracting and exchange rate
lines dropped the row's project.
Write project into the GL dict and pass project=item.project on the entries
that were missing it, so project behaves like cost center and matches
Purchase Invoice.
Ticket: 72523
(cherry picked from commit 6f97c7199c)
Co-authored-by: Jatin3128 <140256508+Jatin3128@users.noreply.github.com>
rfq_transaction_list had two defects introduced when it was converted to the query
builder:
1. `party.supplier == party[0]` compared supplier to a column literally named "0"
(a stray index on the DocType, not the intended `parties[0]` value). This renders
as `supplier = \`0\`` / `supplier = "0"` and errors on BOTH engines
(MariaDB: Unknown column '0'; Postgres: column "0" does not exist), so the
supplier portal RFQ list was completely broken.
2. SELECT DISTINCT ordered by `creation`, which is not in the select list. Postgres
rejects this ("for SELECT DISTINCT, ORDER BY expressions must appear in select list").
Compare against `parties[0]` and add `creation` to the select list.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit a7d9078bf4)
# Conflicts:
# erpnext/controllers/tests/test_website_list_for_contact.py
Replace per-test company creation in setUp() with persistent master data
from BootStrapTestData. Add Test PCV Company to test_records.json so it
becomes a persistent fixture rather than a throwaway created per test run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6e62750c2f)
# Conflicts:
# erpnext/accounts/report/financial_ratios/test_financial_ratios.py
fix: do not allow closing the accounting period for future dates (#56551)
(cherry picked from commit 5e60e4faa7)
Co-authored-by: rohitwaghchaure <rohitw1991@gmail.com>
