Currently, the permission checks within the class try to singularize the table name, then check for permissions based on the result. This PR modifies the private singular() function to support table names that end in "...ies", where an _add or _edit permission likely uses a 'y' instead. An example would be where inserting records into v_event_categories, the class should probably look for an "event_category_add" permission, instead of "event_categorie_add". Likewise for update queries.
This proposed change isn't foolproof, obviously. In the case of inserting or updating records in a table named v_pies, it would fail to suffice. You're welcome to integrate a better solution, if one exists.
* Update {$mac}.cfg
Polycom will not support wild card cert only if you disable strictCertCommonNameValidation
also polycom is missing many root certs so we need an option to push them via the template
bot stuff was tested by me in production and its working fine
* Use isset
This is going to sound really stupid but I have tested this extensively, submitted a Jira on it months ago (was told FS 1.6.20 was no longer supported) and it's still an issue. Please do not take my word for this and create a ring group to test the delay settings with a stopwatch and you should see the real vs set delay discrepancy.
In FreeSWITCH (both on 1.6.20 and 1.8.5) when sending leg_delay_start values, for whatever reason the actual time is double the value sent. The result of this is that if you send 1000ms as leg_delay_start the actual time the call will be delayed is 2000ms.
Because of this bad behavior, ring group delay settings end up being exactly double what is set. e.g. if you set 10s, you will have to wait 20s for the call to be initiated on leg b.
The easiest way to fix this behavior is to simply multiply leg_delay_start by half as much to get the right "real" delay time. Ugly, I know... I'm not sure if leg_delay_start value is passed elsewhere, I'm thinking this behavior may also be present in find me/follow me. If this gets accepted I will look for other locations where this behavior occurs and submit separate PRs if I find any other instances of this.
